Ethical Dilemma #1
**This post, and the next post entitled, Ethical Dilemma #2 are for a class.**
This is the link to my ethical dilema. Here is the link to the video, in question.
The Ethical Dilemma is that it has nothing to do with the election. It’s also showing gruseum things that the public doesn’t need to see. If I am running for an office, I would say what my plan is. As Ted Leonsis said, “If I was a candidate right now, I would NOT get into the mud. I would try to rise up and rally America with a plan; with specifics; and with inspiration.” The shape our country is in, we don’t have time to deal with the smack talking, we need facts.
If I were a candidate, and this ad came to me, I would first of all, tell them absolutely not. This has NOTHING to do with the shape the United States is in. It has nothing to do with the majority of the United States. Not once does it mention what the alternative is. It also never mentioned the overpopulation of the wolves in that area, and how they come into camps, and how they injure people.
If this was an ad I was putting out, I would change it around, you don’t have to show animals getting killed to get your point up. You could get the point by just doing a dark commercial with white words on the screen, a completely silent commercial, people would notice that there was no sound and pay attention to it. Whenever something changes on the television and I’m watching, I notice.

